Nuclear Entanglement

A Dangerous Confusion We Can’t Ignore

Recently, I came across the term “nuclear entanglement”, in the wake of current war scenario in the world. I tried to explore it in detail. The term "nuclear entanglement" basically refers to a growing problem where the same military systems, like satellites or communication networks, are used for both nuclear and conventional weapons. That might seem efficient, but in a real conflict, it can be deadly.

Let us think, if one country attacks satellite of another country, using non-nuclear weapons. But that satellite also controls nuclear systems. Then the defending country might get panicked, and think that a nuclear attack is coming. In this case that country could respond with nuclear weapons. This all may happen because of a misunderstanding only.

This may get risky with missiles that can carry either nuclear warhead or non-nuclear warheads. As such, in case of such a crisis, there’s no way to tell the difference until it’s too late. Now a days, the cyberattacks and anti-satellite weapons only add to the confusion.

So what is the solution?

First is the awareness. Both the political leaders and military officers need to understand these kind of risks.

Second, there should be separate identifying systems for nuclear weapons and for non-nuclear weapons. This shold be made for wherever possible.

And third, to avoid attacking systems that could be tied to nuclear command and control, even in a conventional war.

Nuclear entanglement is a silent threat—born not out of bad intent, but of confusion. And in a nuclear world, confusion can cost us everything. Nuclear disarmament is the only solution, and peaceful use of nuclear energy to be promoted.

– B. P. Singh BPS The Atomic Explorer